Posts Tagged With: Case Law
![](https://semperalacer.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/eagle_and_flag1.jpg)
Categories
Top Posts
Recent Posts
NetworkedBlogs
Archives
Old Blog
Reading List
* The Holy Bible
* The Constitution of the United States
* The Declaration of Independence
* 10 Books that Screwed Up the World by Benjamin Wiker
* 10 Books Every Conservative Must Read by Benjamin Wiker
* Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell
* Applied Economics by Thomas Sowell
* Epicenter by Joel Rosenberg
* Inside the Revolution by Joel Rosenberg
* The 5000 Year Leap by W. Cleon Skousen
* The Forgotten Man by Amity Shlaes
* The Founders' Second Amendment by Stephen Halbrook
* Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg
* New Deal or Raw Deal by Burton Folsom Jr.
* The Real Benjamin Franklin by Andrew M. Allison
* The Real George Washington by Jay A. Parry
* The Real Thomas Jefferson by Andrew M. Allison
* The Survivors Club by Ben Sherwood
* Target : Patton by Robert K. Wilcox (The important part of this book is insight into the Soviet infiltration of the FDR administration.)
* Broke: The Plan to Restore Our Trust, Truth and Treasure by Glenn Beck
The Blaze News
- How the 'Blaze Star,' some 3,000 light-years from Earth, will give naked-eye stargazers 'once-in-a-lifetime' thermonuclear event
- Hero fishermen save 38 dogs on the verge of drowning in Mississippi lake
- Video: Parents, students involved in several fights at high school graduation in New Jersey, one person hospitalized
- Father of 13-year-old girl allegedly raped by illegal alien in NYC park slams Biden's open border for attack: 'This is what happens'
- Federal abitrator orders SEIU to pay California hospital over $6 million for illegal 2020 nurses' strike
- What the IDF just said about Hamas should 'TERRIFY everybody'
- Paris residents are planning to poop in the Seine en masse tomorrow to protest poor water conditions ahead of Olympics
- Joy Behar of ‘The View’ and MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow are DELUSIONAL; afraid Trump will TARGET them
- WNBA game moved to larger arena to accommodate crowds wanting to see Caitlin Clark
- Former attorney general pulls rug from under DOJ's defense for keeping Biden tapes hidden
The Foundry News
- Trump Vows Task Force to Investigate Anti-Christian Bias
- For Caitlin Clark, Adversity Leads to Triumph
- Parental Rights Leaders Highlight Threats to Kids
- GOP Senators Demand Information From HHS on In Vitro Fertilization Clinics
- Manhattan DA Proves Left-Wing Activists Are Above the Law in New York
- EXCLUSIVE: Migrants on Unregistered Mopeds in DC Use Food Delivery Apps—Violating Company Rules
- Supreme Court Upholds Law Allowing Confiscation of Firearms. Why All Is Not Lost.
- Biden’s 5 Favorite Fudges on Immigration Law: The BorderLine
- ‘Something Going On in Our Country,’ Ben Carson Says at Road to Majority Confab
- ‘We’re Not Stupid’: Tulsi Gabbard Slams ‘Propaganda’ Media for Parroting White House ‘Cheap Fakes’ Rhetoric
Hot Air » Top Picks
- White House: Here come the tax hikes
- Alleged Cuomo groping victim: 'all I remember is seeing his hand, his big hand'
- Report: MLB commissioner yanked All-Star Game after speaking with Stacey Abrams
- Haley: Why is Harris "missing in action" on the border crisis?
- Gillibrand: Paid leave, child care, and caregiving are all "infrastructure"
- UK coronavirus variant is now dominant in the U.S.
- "Morning Joe": Let's face it, it's impossible to square Biden's positions on the All-Star Game and the Masters
- Biden admin releases next step in how they will undermine sexual assault victims in schools
- Biden's next EO. Background checks for "ghost guns"
- Eric Holder: Texas GOP lawmakers are finding "diabolical ways" to deny voting access to minorities
Renew America Headlines
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Renew America Columns
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Catholic World News
- Cardinal Parolin warns against credulous faith in technology, 'delirium of self-sufficiency' (L'Osservatore Romano (Italian))
- Pope wants to visit China, Cardinal Parolin confirms (Vatican News)
- Archbishop Vigano, charged with schism, defiant (Exsurge Domine (Italian))
- President Biden pledges 'national strategy' to counter 'scourge' of Islamophobia (White House)
- Italy's Meloni blocks Biden's push for abortion at G7 (Daily Signal )
- A decade after ISIS advance, churches are 'filled again' in Iraq (Aid to the Church in Need)
- Do not be indifferent to refugees, Pope urges (@Pontifex)
- USCCB committee chairman highlights 'urgent need' to promote refugees' dignity, rights (USCCB)
- TLM scheduled for National Eucharistic Congress (Pillar)
- Be true to yourselves, Pope urges students (Vatican News)
Nullification Now? Nullification No!
(Image: Wikimedia Commons)
With the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding Obamacare, in what at best might be described as an attempt by John Roberts to “save” the “reputation” of the Supreme Court, many are again calling on states to use nullification to stop implementation of Obamacare. Nullification is the legal theory which claims individual states have a right to nullify or invalidate any federal laws which an individual state deems unconstitutional. On the surface, it might sound like a good idea. However, we must dig a little deeper to understand why “nullification now” is not the answer in our current Constitutional crisis.
People often don’t like hearing reality contrary to their opinion (and more than a few seem to enjoy playing “shoot the messenger”), but nullification is quite simply a dead horse. United States jurisprudence has a long track record of not upholding nullification. From 1798 until the start of the Civil War in 1861, several states either threatened or attempted to nullify different federal laws. None of these nullification attempts were upheld by the Supreme Court. On top of this, the Civil War, as a victory for a powerful and centralized federal government, effectively silenced further nullification attempts.
Nullification remained a dead issue until the mid-twentieth century. It once again reared its head in the 1950s as southern states fought against forced integration of public schools by the federal government. This time, nullification went to the Supreme Court as a specific issue and was explicitly struck down in Cooper v. Aaron (1958). In this case, the Court explicitly, once-and-for-all, clearly declared that individual states may not refuse to enforce federal law. As an aside, we also find the Court now claiming that individual states likewise may not enforce federal law which the federal government refuses to enforce itself: Arizona v. United States (2012).
Such rulings stem from the fact the Supreme Court has interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment in such a way as to use it to apply nearly the entire Bill of Rights to the states. In the process, the Court has largely eradicated individual state sovereignty. Keep in mind, when the Bill of Rights was drafted, it was understood as something imposing limits on the federal government, not on individual state governments. Had those voting on it understood it applying to state governments, it would have never garnered the votes necessary for ratification.
However, even on its own, the nullification theory lacks a valid Constitutional basis; hence the reason the Supreme Court has consistently rejected attempts at nullification by individual states. No less a figure than James Madison held that nullification was unconstitutional. Do nullification proponents seriously believe that James Madison lacked proper understanding of the Constitution?
Further, even if nullification were a Constitutionally valid position, since we’ve allowed the creation at all levels of the job title “career politician” (people for whom reelection trumps doing the right thing), do we seriously believe there are enough state legislators willing to actually pass nullification? Not only would they fear their state being cut off from the teat of federal government appropriations, but would also fear the backlash from the hordes of people now dependent on Big Government handouts (so-called “entitlements”).
On top of this, again even assuming nullification were Constitutionally valid, those calling for nullification are under the impression the federal government would simply allow the sates to “go quietly.” Such a position is nothing short of delusional. Let’s not forget a little thing called the “Civil War.” Consider what Lincoln was able to do with a significantly smaller and significantly less powerful federal government. Now consider the vastly larger and vastly more powerful federal government we’ve allowed to come into existence today. It is not a bureaucracy that can simply be ignored; nor indeed a bureaucracy that will allow itself to simply be ignored.
Before I get attacked with the dreaded label of “neocon” (a phrase so causally tossed out by Tom Woods/Ron Paul libertarians whenever they believe they’re losing an argument – as if calling their opponent a “neocon” triumphantly and automatically settles every argument in their favor; odd how they so often insist on employing the exact same sort of name-calling tactics as TeamObama against anyone who happens to disagree with their position – but that’s an issue in itself for another time), I’m not saying I like the situation as it is; instead I am simply describing reality as it is. Ron Paul, Tom Woods, and anyone else are welcome to disagree all they want, but simply disagreeing with reality does not alter its existence. And since it is reality with which we must deal, and since the nullification road has already been shown to be a dead end, we need to get smart and engage in tactics which actually stand a chance of working.
Given the state of Constitutional Law, it’s too late to attack the issue of overturning Obamacare primarily through legal “tricks” in state legislatures; instead, the primary path to attack this issue is through a wholesale change of the federal-level legislative and executive branches, backed up with strong state legislative and executive branches. The only way to make this change happen is through changing the “hearts and minds” of individual citizens.
We need to once and for all wake people up to their responsibility as citizens to be informed about not only issues and candidates, but about the structure and function of our representative Republic. People must learn to read the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the writings of our founders in order to understand what ought to be, coupled with reading Constitutional case law in order to understand what is; thereby being able to devise appropriate strategies to move what is back to what ought to be. We need to ensure the roughly 30% of conservative-minded people who are not currently registered to vote, not only get registered, but also exercise their responsibility to participate in the election process. And the tallest order in today’s environment: we need to get people who’ve been indoctrinated in the “entitlement” mentality to understand that a Big Government nanny state “providing” for them from cradle to grave is not freedom, but bondage.
In short, the way we win is by causing a fundamental shift in world view back to traditional American values and principles.