Not Race, but Power

The NAACP levels charges of racism against the TEA Party movement, claiming their actions stem from racial slurs hurled at black members of congress during the rally against passage of Obamacare a few months ago.  Yet, despite the salivating media looking to disparage the TEA Party movement and a $10,000 reward offered by Andrew Breitbart, absolutely zero proof has surfaced of anyone saying any racial slurs – even with all the video cameras rolling at the time. So, the NAACP claims very strongly appear to have absolutely no basis in reality.

While attacking the TEA Party movement over supposed racism, when zero evidence exists, at the same time the NAACP ignores members of the New Black Panthers intimidating voters and calling for the murder of all white “cracker” babies.  Clearly, a double standard is in effect here.  Why?

In reality, the current situation has nothing to do with race.  Instead, it has everything to do with advancing the largest Marxist-socialist power grab in history.  It’s a tactic ripped directly from the Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals play book.

The idea is to disparage the enemy so his voice becomes irrelevant.  It’s the age old military tactic of divide and conquer.  For some reason, there’s still a large group of Americans sitting on the sidelines.  If they can be convinced the TEA Party movement is nothing but a bunch of racist white “crackers,” then they discount anything said by someone associated with the TEA Party movement (and by implication, anyone who wants to see government return to its Constitutional bounds).  Just like Russia, just like Nazi Germany, just like the Cuban Revolution, by the time the majority of people wake up to what’s really going on, it’s too late to do anything to stop it.

In order to defeat the enemy, we must first understand the enemy.  Today’s enemy of liberty, freedom and the Constitution are Marxist-socialist radicals.  They are very clearly operating directly from Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals.  Understand the Rules, and you have the ammunition to defeat them.  They’re attempting to use our “rules” against us to defeat liberty, freedom and the Constitution.  Let’s turn the table and use their rules against them to defeat Marxist-socialist tyranny.

Far too many people, who don’t understand the radical’s mentality, think radicals employ over-the-top speech simply to express a point.  This ignores the fact that radical after radical throughout history told us exactly what he intended to accomplish (Hitler’s Mein Kampf as merely one example), yet people brushed it off as “just wild talk.”  When a radical speaks, he’s not just blowing smoke; he actually means what he says.

Like most radials, Alinsky expresses a typical atheistic attitude which believes if you think your ends are worthy, then any means used to reach those ends can be justified – likewise, the more important you believe your ends (such as establishing a “utopian” Marxist state), the more otherwise unthinkable means become “justified.”  This is an extremely dangerous position.  It means when a radical says in order to reach the goal of “liberation,” all white “crackers” must be killed, he means all white “crackers” must be killed.

With that in mind, here are Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals:

Rules for Power Tactics:

1. Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.
2. Never go outside the experience of your people.
3. Whenever possible, go outside of the experience of the enemy.
4. Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
5. Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.
6. A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
8. Keep the pressure on with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.
9. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
10. The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
11. If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside.
12. The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.
13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

Rules to test whether power tactics are ethical:

1. One’s concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with one’s personal interest in the issue.
2. The judgment of the ethics of means is dependent upon the political position of those sitting in judgment.
3. In war the end justifies almost any means.
4. Judgment must be made in the context of the times in which the action occurred and not from any other chronological vantage point.
5. Concern with ethics increases with the number of means available and vice versa.
6. The less important the end to be desired, the more one can afford to engage in ethical evaluations of means.
7. Generally, success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics.
8. The morality of means depends upon whether the means is being employed at a time of imminent defeat or imminent victory.
9. Any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition to be unethical.
10. You do what you can with what you have and clothe it in moral garments.
11. Goals must be phrased in general terms like “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” “Of the Common Welfare,” “Pursuit of Happiness,” or “Bread and Peace.”