The NAACP levels charges of racism against the TEA Party movement, claiming their actions stem from racial slurs hurled at black members of congress during the rally against passage of Obamacare a few months ago. Yet, despite the salivating media looking to disparage the TEA Party movement and a $10,000 reward offered by Andrew Breitbart, absolutely zero proof has surfaced of anyone saying any racial slurs – even with all the video cameras rolling at the time. So, the NAACP claims very strongly appear to have absolutely no basis in reality.
While attacking the TEA Party movement over supposed racism, when zero evidence exists, at the same time the NAACP ignores members of the New Black Panthers intimidating voters and calling for the murder of all white “cracker” babies. Clearly, a double standard is in effect here. Why?
In reality, the current situation has nothing to do with race. Instead, it has everything to do with advancing the largest Marxist-socialist power grab in history. It’s a tactic ripped directly from the Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals play book.
The idea is to disparage the enemy so his voice becomes irrelevant. It’s the age old military tactic of divide and conquer. For some reason, there’s still a large group of Americans sitting on the sidelines. If they can be convinced the TEA Party movement is nothing but a bunch of racist white “crackers,” then they discount anything said by someone associated with the TEA Party movement (and by implication, anyone who wants to see government return to its Constitutional bounds). Just like Russia, just like Nazi Germany, just like the Cuban Revolution, by the time the majority of people wake up to what’s really going on, it’s too late to do anything to stop it.
In order to defeat the enemy, we must first understand the enemy. Today’s enemy of liberty, freedom and the Constitution are Marxist-socialist radicals. They are very clearly operating directly from Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. Understand the Rules, and you have the ammunition to defeat them. They’re attempting to use our “rules” against us to defeat liberty, freedom and the Constitution. Let’s turn the table and use their rules against them to defeat Marxist-socialist tyranny.
Far too many people, who don’t understand the radical’s mentality, think radicals employ over-the-top speech simply to express a point. This ignores the fact that radical after radical throughout history told us exactly what he intended to accomplish (Hitler’s Mein Kampf as merely one example), yet people brushed it off as “just wild talk.” When a radical speaks, he’s not just blowing smoke; he actually means what he says.
Like most radials, Alinsky expresses a typical atheistic attitude which believes if you think your ends are worthy, then any means used to reach those ends can be justified – likewise, the more important you believe your ends (such as establishing a “utopian” Marxist state), the more otherwise unthinkable means become “justified.” This is an extremely dangerous position. It means when a radical says in order to reach the goal of “liberation,” all white “crackers” must be killed, he means all white “crackers” must be killed.
With that in mind, here are Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals:
Rules for Power Tactics:
1. Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.
2. Never go outside the experience of your people.
3. Whenever possible, go outside of the experience of the enemy.
4. Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
5. Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.
6. A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
8. Keep the pressure on with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.
9. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
10. The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
11. If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside.
12. The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.
13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
Rules to test whether power tactics are ethical:
1. One’s concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with one’s personal interest in the issue.
2. The judgment of the ethics of means is dependent upon the political position of those sitting in judgment.
3. In war the end justifies almost any means.
4. Judgment must be made in the context of the times in which the action occurred and not from any other chronological vantage point.
5. Concern with ethics increases with the number of means available and vice versa.
6. The less important the end to be desired, the more one can afford to engage in ethical evaluations of means.
7. Generally, success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics.
8. The morality of means depends upon whether the means is being employed at a time of imminent defeat or imminent victory.
9. Any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition to be unethical.
10. You do what you can with what you have and clothe it in moral garments.
11. Goals must be phrased in general terms like “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” “Of the Common Welfare,” “Pursuit of Happiness,” or “Bread and Peace.”
Semper Alacer 
Congresswoman Shot, Left goes on Witch Hunt
Jared Loughner: The Real Face of Responsibility
Yesterday’s shooting at Representative Gabrielle Giffords’ Congress on Your Corner in Arizona is a horrible and tragic event that should never have happened. However, it did and therefore we must deal with it.
The shooting is a tragedy which should be uniting us in support and defense of the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. It should be bringing all of us together in support of our way of life and our representative Republic form of government. After all, Giffords’ event, an elected representative speaking with constituents, is the foundation of our Republic.
How are many on the left responding? Instead of putting politics aside and coming together, they’re using it as yet another opportunity to divide America using crass and sickening political theater. Arizona State Senator Linda Lopez only hours after the shooting, before any definite information was available, went on national television with accusations that the shooter was an “Afghan” veteran influenced by the TEA party movement. Then Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik ended his press conference with a tirade blaming conservative media for filling the American people with vitriol. It should be noted Sheriff Dupnik also believes Arizona’s recent law calling for enforcement of federal immigration law is “stupid” and “racist.”
The left-wing media and blogosphere are filled with accusations against Sarah Palin because of a marketing piece which had a target on Giffords’ congressional district (not on Giffords’ face as is being implied). These accusations are utter nonsense. First, Democrats and leftists have used similar marketing tactics in the past, not to mention even more disturbing depictions of former President Bush by the left, yet those blaming Palin for the shooting don’t bother to mention any use by the left of these types of marketing tactics. Second, either the people making these accusations are such complete idiots or they believe others are such complete idiots that they can’t distinguish between a political advertising marketing tactic and an actual death threat. If you truly believe a target on someone’s district was an actual death threat then you need to be locked up in the same sort of padded cell where the gunman belonged!
This is only one person responsible for yesterday’s shooting: Jared Loughner who pulled the trigger. Apparently another suspect, known to authorities, remains at large. Yet, Sheriff Dupnik, citing the advice of “legal counsel,” refuses to release photos or a complete description of this person so the public can be on the lookout for him. [Update: The Pima Sheriff’s Department finally released a photo of this person-of-interest. Update to the Update: Pima Sheriff has cleared the person of interest.]
So what’s the picture of Loughner that’s emerging? We now know he wasn’t an “Afghan” veteran or a veteran at all. He applied for military service and was rejected. The military won’t say why, citing privacy reasons. However, the disjoined ramblings from his YouTube videos give us a pretty good clue. We also know he’s been arrested for possession of illegal drugs. It looks more and more like he is a demented leftist radical anarchist pothead. Despite this, many on the left and the mainstream media continue to either openly or subtly blame the TEA party movement and conservative media. It’s obvious they’re taking Rahm Emanuel’s advice to not let a good crisis go to waste and seek to use the tragedy as the springboard for censorship of conservative media, silencing of anyone who disagrees with their agenda, and very likely “gun control” as well.
The TEA Party movement – a movement and a mindset, not a political party – is about government accountability. “TEA” is an acronym for Taxed Enough Already. The movement consists of people from a wide spectrum of political beliefs. They are united in a belief that government should act within its Constitutional bounds and those within government, both elected officials and bureaucrats, should be accountable to the people who pay the bill (the American taxpayers). Acts of violence against the government are completely counterproductive to the aims of this movement, which seeks to restore Constitutional order. Therefore, it’s pure absurdity to claim, as the left does, the TEA party and conservatives are agitating for violence.
Let’s look at the other side. What do they have to say? Many on the left, including some who’ve been right next to Obama, are calling for an overthrow of the system, such as self-described Marxist-socialist Van Jones’ “bottom up, top down, inside out” revolution. Frances Fox Piven, who many in the administration and many radical leftists hold up as a mentor, is calling for a violent uprising against the American system. Obama once told left-wing activists, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.” Another left-wing guru, political cartoonist Ted Rall, calls for the left to engage in violence against the right. The often cited “bible” of leftists and one of the books from which Loughner says he found inspiration, the Communist Manifesto, is filled with calls for violence against the bourgeoisies and government officials.
Don’t get me wrong – unlike the left, I don’t want to restrict any of their speech; I want the cockroaches exposed to the light of day so we can clearly see them for exactly what they are. My point is to expose the outright lies of the left in claiming conservatives are “inciting violence” when in fact it’s those on the radical left who are consistently and clearly calling for violent uprisings.
Is it because so many on the left are calling for open, violent uprising that they are so convinced conservatives are doing the same? As someone who pays very close attention to conservative media, I can find absolutely nothing which even comes close to the left’s repeated and unequivocal calls for violence. Conservative media talks about things like restoring honor, returning to the Constitution, taking personal responsibility, government accountability, the importance of integrity, and so forth. I must not have the “Manchurian” programming, since I’m completely missing any calls to violence, “coded” or otherwise.
It’s time for Americans of all political persuasions who might disagree on policy, but agree on the basic framework of the Constitution and the representative Republic to stand together. We simply cannot allow radicals to collapse our Republic. We must find the common ground of the Constitution on which we can unite. We can agree to disagree without being disagreeable.
We honor the memory of those killed when we stand up for the Constitution in the face of the real radicals, like Jared Loughner, who seek to destroy our Republic.